Alternative protein sources encompass everything from algae to re-engineered plant-based legumes and a variety of meat substitutes. Think of lab-grown meat, plant-based meat, single-cell proteins from yeast or algae, and edible insects.
Edible insects include cricket flour.
Cricket flour (or cricket powder) is a protein-rich powder made from crickets, using various processes.[1][2] Cricket flour differs from true flours made from grains by being composed mainly of protein rather than starches and dietary fiber. —Wikipedia
What does the law of God say about this?
Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket, or grasshopper. (Leviticus 11:22)
The Bible says it’s ok to eat crickets and grasshoppers. So, we shouldn’t judge anyone who chooses this diet. Alternative proteins are here because the world is worried about climate change.
The climate crisis is here. Forests are burning. Oceans are rising. Climate change is no longer a future threat. You are living in it now, as you read this. The main problem is carbon. —Jane Goodall Institute Canada
A Mission for the Planet
The World Economic Forum is trying to remodel the food system because of climate change from carbon emissions. They want to do away with the long-standing processes of animal slaughtering and meat packing. This remodeling is through a “protein transformation”:
The protein transformation is one part of a broader remodeling of the food system. As value pools form around new technologies and processes that help address such critical issues as taste, health, and cost, the need for some long-standing processes, such as animal slaughtering and meat packing, will decline. Every stakeholder along the value chain is likely to feel the impact of the transformation, and many will find big opportunities in contributing to building a sustainable food system.
Alternative proteins include plant, fermented, and animal/cell-based protein.
Italy is on the road to being the first country to ban cultivated meat, which is being met with hostility from climate activists.
Meloni’s gastro-nationalist sop may appeal to the agricultural vote in this food-obsessed country, but if passed into law, it could end up exacerbating the bigger threat to Italy’s food system: https://news.yahoo.com/italy-wants-first-country-ban-181801178.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
As climate change gets worse, climate activists will evolve to climate terrorists.
Europe is warming more than twice the global average, and two-thirds of the continent, including Italy, has been hit by the worst drought in at least 500 years—one made three to four times more likely by global warming, according to climate scientists.
We’ve already addressed the fact the climate change is real. The earth is wearing out like an old t-shirt, and there’s nothing we can do to stop this process. We can’t make the t-shirt new again, even though we still love it. Let’s continue with the World Economic Forum in regard to alternative proteins:
Our latest research shows that people around the world are buying into alternative proteins—and are very happy with what they find. The market share projections that we made in our first Food for Thought report in 2021 are bearing out: current forecast models indicate that alternative proteins will represent 11% of all protein consumption by 2035, and with some help from technology, investors, and regulators, alternative proteins could command 22% of the global market over this time frame.
This is good news for everyone involved in the global effort to combat climate change. The food system accounts for 26% of current global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Animal agriculture, the largest GHG emitter within the food system, is responsible for 15% of global emissions, roughly matching the emissions from the transportation sector. If we remain on track for an 11% share for alternative proteins by 2035, we will see a reduction of 0.85 gigaton of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) worldwide by 2030—equal to decarbonizing 95% of the aviation industry. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/07/protein-diet-vegan-climate-food-system-decarbonization/
Why don’t we just get rid of the aviation industry instead of our food? It’s obvious WEF wants to move away from animal agriculture, and they’re not hiding it. Animal cruelty is always cited, but slaughtering livestock for food is not cruelty. We should always be trying to make the agricultural industry as humane as possible.
Climate activists who are instrumental in the food industry say that climate change is a poor argument against meat substitutes. They say the real problem is getting the meat substitutes to taste like real beef. Flavor scientists are involved in getting the taste right. Beef blood is even being copied.
This fake blood is called soy leghemoglobin, and it might not be the best thing for us: https://www.gmoscience.org/2019/06/25/rat-feeding-studies-suggest-the-impossible-burger-may-not-be-safe-to-eat/. It’s already been approved by the FDA. Impossible Foods asked the American FDA for their approval to use soy leghemoglobin in foods as an analog of meat-derived hemoglobin. People shouldn’t be judged if they can’t eat meat for medical reasons or if they choose not to. Nothing should be forced upon us. All food has been declared clean by Jesus Christ.
Climate activists and WEF firmly believe the future holds no place for traditional beef. They truly believe that future generations will look back and wonder why we ever ate meat. Of course, WEF, globalists, world governments, and climate change activists blame human activity and the agriculture industry for climate change.
By some estimates, the agriculture industry produces one-third of the world’s greenhouse gases linked to human activity, is a primary driver of deforestation and uses as much as 70% of the world’s fresh water supply. https://www.yahoo.com/news/plant-based-food-companies-face-142424581.html
Let’s look at an excerpt from a recent report from NOAA:
“The major atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations — carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide — each rose once again to new record highs during 2021,” the report states.
Scientists link greenhouse gases to human activity and the agricultural industry.
Part of the plan is to force farmers to use less fertilizer and decrease their livestock in an effort to reduce animal emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia. Globalists want to eliminate the consumption of meat and replace it with lab-grown, or cultivated, meat:
In addition to mitigating animal slaughter, cultivated meat could also help slow climate change driven by greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide and methane. https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/06/health/lab-grown-meat-pros-cons-life-itself-wellness-scn/index.html
Let’s read this quote from Fake Steak — Future-Proof Food, from a DW Documentary:
Animal husbandry is responsible for 12 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. 80 percent of all fertile land is used for raising animals and growing their feed. To make room for more, we cut down rainforests and spray pesticides. Meat production is the biggest threat to biodiversity. Yet, animal foods provide only 18 percent of the calories we consume.
Cellular agriculture is also being looked at as a serious option for climate change. Research into immortal cell lines continues to produce meat and other animal products via tissue engineering and synthetic biology. They say they want to create meat, thus not harming animals. In reality, they want to get rid of livestock because they’re being blamed for climate change. The following excerpt is from October 2022: New Zealand’s government on Tuesday proposed taxing farm animals’ greenhouse gas emissions as part of its efforts to reduce the pollution that is causing climate change. The tax would be the world’s first on animal emissions, including those from burps and urination, which contribute to rising global temperatures. https://news.yahoo.com/new-zealand-proposes-cow-burp-tax-to-fight-climate-change-185050480.html
Other options are on the table to limit the amount of methane belched by cows, such as introducing seaweed in the cow’s diet: https://www.yahoo.com/news/feeding-cows-few-ounces-seaweed-180303759.html
Currently, “climate-friendly” cows are being bred to belch less methane: The arrival of commercially available genetics to produce dairy cattle that emit less methane could help reduce one of the biggest sources of the potent greenhouse gas, scientists and cattle industry experts say. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-friendly-cows-bred-belch-less-methane-2023-08-08/
Methane from enteric fermentation seems to be the main problem for climate change activists and WEF. They say that if we reduce the consumption of beef, we free up land that’s used to grow feed and use it to grow food for humans. But even if we stopped eating beef, what do we do with all the cows? Aren’t they still belching methane? They stop short of saying that we should kill them all, but it’s insinuated. Let’s go to India:
The world might have a fight on their hands if they try to tell India to kill their 308 million sacred cattle.
In some countries, such as the Netherlands, governments are intervening in grain production by implementing an unsustainable level of restrictions. These restrictions have made it almost impossible for farmers to continue farming. https://www.bbntimes.com/global-economy/food-shortages-may-come-from-excessive-intervention. The World Economic Forum claims to support farmers.
World leaders are saying we have to stop climate change, or it will stop us. Scientists say human activity is 100 percent to blame for climate change because we run the agriculture industry. Ultimately, their goal is to kill all cattle on earth to reduce emissions.
As climate change gets worse and things get desperate, globalists, climate activists, and world leaders might say, “Because the climate is getting worse from carbon emissions, we have to start reducing emissions now, or we’ll all die. We have to stop eating meat, kill all cattle so they’ll stop belching unnatural methane, and we have to get the human population down to five hundred million so that we’ll be in perpetual balance with nature. Let’s start the depopulation process by registering those troublesome Christians in a database. They’re always telling us how to live our lives and follow Jesus or we’re going to hell. Those Christians are insane. They have to go.”
The one who overcomes will inherit all things, and I will be his God, and he will be my son. (Revelation 21:7)
As it went for the Jews in Hitler’s holocaust, so it will go for Christians during the world reign of the antichrist in his New World Order. At some point during this persecution, Jesus Christ will appear and gather the faithful, we who are alive who are left, and then God’s wrath will begin on the world.
The earth is wearing out like a garment, as it says in Isaiah 51:6, and there’s nothing we can do to stop this process. People are going to make the tear worse by trying to sew a new patch on old cloth. Let’s not put our hope in this dying world, but in the saving grace of God our savior.
Put not your trust in princes, in mortal man, who cannot save. (Psalm 146:3)
Copyright Act of 1976 17 U.S.C. § 107 allows for the use of work that is used for comment, criticism, or education. FAIR USE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. This is under Fair Use with purpose to educate and inform the public.
Futile World 